For some students, the writing of texts is an insurmountable hurdle: The sheet wants and will not fill.

Hours become days and even the extensive research yields only a barren row yield. What to do?

First, it’s about understanding that there is no silver bullet to a scientific text. Although academic work is strongly structured and characterized by general methods and basic principles, every text – and every path to the text – is individual.

Anyone who thinks they can fill pages without real content, or having to stretch their text by changing the font size, line spacing or margin, not only wastes time, but also loses interest in the topic. Dodge is the need to present their own content and conclusions, not anyway, especially since hardly an auditor can be deceived in this way. Threshing pages is not a solution, it just distracts. Especially in times of tight deadlines, such a distraction is extremely harmful.

A scientific paper needs foundations on which to build. If these are lacking, no clear reasoning can emerge and coherence is lacking. A concentrated reboot of the entire work may be cheaper than just “pushing on” at a low level. But where should the content come from? The answer is simple: from the evaluation of appropriate literature, consistent thinking and establishing relationships between the individual theses.

Perhaps it helps to imagine the scientific methods less as a limit than as opportunities for development, which give the work a structure: A successful structure is already an important step on the way to the finished work, because it sets the topics and rules that are worked , In particular, in the planning, structure, literature search and editing the help of academic ghostwriters can be claimed.